Farm Subsidy information
Indiana
Total Subsidies in Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 172,549
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Indiana totaled $16,497,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Beacon Credit Union ** | Wabash, IN 46992 | $21,411,679 |
2 | Walker Place | Danville, IL 61832 | $17,412,473 |
3 | Crossroad Farms | Williamsport, IN 47993 | $15,312,737 |
4 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $10,051,907 |
5 | Agri Business Finance ** | St Paris, OH 43072 | $9,763,848 |
6 | Tom Farms Partners | Leesburg, IN 46538 | $8,075,113 |
7 | White Oak Farms | Cloverdale, IN 46120 | $7,410,385 |
8 | Likens Farms | Anderson, IN 46011 | $7,153,578 |
9 | Seng Bros | Dubois, IN 47527 | $6,080,880 |
10 | Suiter Farms Partnership | Earl Park, IN 47942 | $5,994,315 |
11 | Armes Grain & Livestock | Washington, IN 47501 | $5,872,075 |
12 | Graham Creek Farms | Commiskey, IN 47227 | $5,744,809 |
13 | Mills Brothers Farms | Ladoga, IN 47954 | $5,704,679 |
14 | Harper Brothers Farms | Medaryville, IN 47957 | $4,976,993 |
15 | Anson Family Farms | Monroe City, IN 47557 | $4,969,518 |
16 | Moon Island Farms Partnership | Lowell, IN 46356 | $4,959,053 |
17 | S & C Cornelius Farms | Switz City, IN 47465 | $4,936,298 |
18 | Ames 4k Farms | Fillmore, IN 46128 | $4,713,028 |
19 | Bowman Farms | La Fontaine, IN 46940 | $4,710,764 |
20 | J&t Laidig Farms Partnership | Bremen, IN 46506 | $4,381,964 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>