Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) in Indiana, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 626
Recipients of Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) from farms in Indiana totaled $4,240,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Tom Farms Partners | Leesburg, IN 46538 | $71,250 |
2 | Gasper Farms Partnership | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $59,375 |
3 | Stoy Farms | Ashley, IN 46705 | $51,342 |
4 | Maple Pork Farms | Kokomo, IN 46901 | $47,500 |
5 | Ams Farms | Monroe City, IN 47557 | $47,500 |
6 | Hageman Farms Partnership | Remington, IN 47977 | $47,271 |
7 | Red Fox Farms | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $43,046 |
8 | Furrer Crop Farms | Wolcott, IN 47995 | $27,839 |
9 | N & K Cornelius Farms | Plainville, IN 47568 | $23,750 |
10 | Cooprider & Sons | Jasonville, IN 47438 | $23,750 |
11 | Reed Farms | Andrews, IN 46702 | $23,750 |
12 | Baker Farms Gp | Ossian, IN 46777 | $23,750 |
13 | Ternet Farms Partnership | New Haven, IN 46774 | $23,750 |
14 | Shady Lane Farms General Partnership | South Bend, IN 46619 | $23,750 |
15 | Koebcke Brothers | Rensselaer, IN 47978 | $17,582 |
16 | Fansler Farms General Partnership | Shelbyville, IN 46176 | $14,674 |
17 | Kent Brothers | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $14,530 |
18 | Agrivista Properties | Medaryville, IN 47957 | $13,766 |
19 | Thomas C Stewart,james G Stewart & Stephen G Gunn | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $13,484 |
20 | Kelly L Carlson | Attica, IN 47918 | $11,875 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>