Total Conservation Programs in Indiana, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 55,067

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Indiana totaled $1,168,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
1Thomas A VaterHammond, IN 46324$1,115,708
2Bryan R WippermanSouth Bend, IN 46628$1,035,789
3The Liskey Family Revocable TrustNorth Judson, IN 46366$1,018,393
4Steury Brothers Construction Co Stateline FarmsSpencerville, IN 46788$986,441
5R L Zollman IncMedora, IN 47260$941,010
6James HallarMonticello, IN 47960$908,650
7Cain's Homelike Farms IncDarlington, IN 47940$905,829
8John R SeifertNorth Vernon, IN 47265$878,640
9Hale Farms %robert HaleWaveland, IN 47989$875,096
10Dillon Revocable Living Trust Dated 2/12/14Pierceton, IN 46562$869,512
11Gary WhitenackPortland, IN 47371$863,481
12Philip J WhitenackRidgeville, IN 47380$863,478
13Workman FarmsCulver, IN 46511$833,268
14Roger Dean SweeneySalem, IN 47167$798,855
15David R WesnerVallonia, IN 47281$774,781
16Acres IncHuntertown, IN 46748$774,504
17Tom & Judith Taggart Revocable Living TrustLebanon, IN 46052$744,277
18Donald M CollerBloomington, IN 47401$717,641
19Morris J R DayNorth Manchester, IN 46962$713,441
20Daniel E GumzNorth Judson, IN 46366$707,054

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag