Production Flexibility Program in Adams County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 701 to 720 of 1,191
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Adams County, Indiana totaled $16,395,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
701 | David A Roe | Monroe, IN 46772 | $2,376 |
702 | Marie Marbach Est | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $2,375 |
703 | Hubert Lengerich | Decatur, IN 46733 | $2,373 |
704 | Jesse E Michaud | Willshire, OH 45898 | $2,372 |
705 | Max E Bollenbacher | Argos, IN 46501 | $2,309 |
706 | Bill W Reynolds | Berne, IN 46711 | $2,299 |
707 | Norman Becher Est | Berne, IN 46711 | $2,291 |
708 | Ryan Linnemeier | Ossian, IN 46777 | $2,278 |
709 | Lotter Farms Inc | Berne, IN 46711 | $2,269 |
710 | Michael R Fields | Geneva, IN 46740 | $2,264 |
711 | Elaine-carl F And El Thieme | Decatur, IN 46733 | $2,264 |
712 | Eugene Fuelling | Decatur, IN 46733 | $2,253 |
713 | Lester E Manley | Decatur, IN 46733 | $2,249 |
714 | Van A Sprunger | Bryant, IN 47326 | $2,227 |
715 | Jody Hurst | Decatur, IN 46733 | $2,226 |
716 | Monty D Miller | Decatur, IN 46733 | $2,209 |
717 | Joshua D Arnold | Decatur, IN 46733 | $2,203 |
718 | Estate Of Donna J Gage | Decatur, IN 46733 | $2,198 |
719 | Fred Schuman | Hudson, IN 46747 | $2,186 |
720 | Mary E Schirack | Decatur, IN 46733 | $2,185 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”