Total Commodity Programs in Allen County, Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 4,289
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Allen County, Indiana totaled $166,532,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Keith Kuehnert | Fort Wayne, IN 46818 | $711,221 |
42 | Ned S Byer | New Haven, IN 46774 | $711,093 |
43 | Dewayne Doctor | Fort Wayne, IN 46816 | $697,065 |
44 | Mark Dennis | Fort Wayne, IN 46814 | $695,884 |
45 | R & D Hartmann | Woodburn, IN 46797 | $691,843 |
46 | Ray Melcher | New Haven, IN 46774 | $679,136 |
47 | Daniel Buchan | Decatur, IN 46733 | $657,789 |
48 | Robert P Hulvey | Yoder, IN 46798 | $643,772 |
49 | Chris Tyner | Fort Wayne, IN 46809 | $642,147 |
50 | Joseph A Malfait | Woodburn, IN 46797 | $632,832 |
51 | Milton Dennis | Fort Wayne, IN 46809 | $614,859 |
52 | Steinman Farms Inc | Woodburn, IN 46797 | $607,191 |
53 | Roger Wm Hadley II | Woodburn, IN 46797 | $595,822 |
54 | Rick E Taylor | Monroeville, IN 46773 | $594,674 |
55 | Gail M Schlatter | Woodburn, IN 46797 | $588,848 |
56 | Michel Heckber | Ossian, IN 46777 | $575,167 |
57 | John R Corbat | Fort Wayne, IN 46818 | $569,914 |
58 | Eugene Trabel | Monroeville, IN 46773 | $532,266 |
59 | Omo Farms | Harlan, IN 46743 | $517,510 |
60 | Jerry Schlaudroff | Monroeville, IN 46773 | $506,560 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”