Total Commodity Programs in Allen County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 4,300
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Allen County, Indiana totaled $167,330,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | David L Gerardot | Monroeville, IN 46773 | $501,363 |
62 | Fertile Acres Inc | Monroeville, IN 46773 | $499,686 |
63 | Stieglitz Farms LLC | Harlan, IN 46743 | $492,701 |
64 | Larry Frazier | Churubusco, IN 46723 | $489,138 |
65 | Roger Rekeweg | Woodburn, IN 46797 | $475,909 |
66 | Mark R Rekeweg Farms LLC | Woodburn, IN 46797 | $474,925 |
67 | Donald L Scott LLC | Monroeville, IN 46773 | $472,072 |
68 | Roger Schaefer | Harlan, IN 46743 | $470,939 |
69 | Paul Fordham | Harlan, IN 46743 | $468,527 |
70 | Spangler Farms Inc | Monroeville, IN 46773 | $460,280 |
71 | James Griebel | Hoagland, IN 46745 | $460,265 |
72 | Douglas L Bradtmueller | Fort Wayne, IN 46816 | $459,174 |
73 | Kelly Coomer | Woodburn, IN 46797 | $459,045 |
74 | Bradtmueller Family Farms LLC | Fort Wayne, IN 46816 | $458,189 |
75 | Vonderau Farms | New Haven, IN 46774 | $449,106 |
76 | Thomas A Franke | Monroeville, IN 46773 | $442,396 |
77 | Wyss Farms Enterprises Gp | Fort Wayne, IN 46819 | $437,557 |
78 | Jerry Hartman | Yoder, IN 46798 | $432,100 |
79 | Steven Schlatter | Woodburn, IN 46797 | $431,948 |
80 | Rex Emenhiser | Monroeville, IN 46773 | $429,006 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”