Total Commodity Programs in Bartholomew County, Indiana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 571
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Bartholomew County, Indiana totaled $3,523,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | C J Shoaf Farms Inc | Hope, IN 47246 | $9,376 |
102 | John Niemoeller | Columbus, IN 47203 | $9,355 |
103 | Julia A Bense | Hope, IN 47246 | $9,323 |
104 | Kenneth L Bense Credit Shelter Trust Fbo Julia Ben | Hope, IN 47246 | $9,323 |
105 | Eric D Scheidt | Columbus, IN 47203 | $9,254 |
106 | George R Hege | Columbus, IN 47203 | $9,195 |
107 | Lynn K Finkel-finkel-kelleghan Family Trust | Jackson, WY 83002 | $9,153 |
108 | Lentz Farms Inc | Columbus, IN 47203 | $9,097 |
109 | Bruce C Sigman Estate | Hope, IN 47246 | $8,922 |
110 | Michael T Legan | Hope, IN 47246 | $8,728 |
111 | David Bonnell | Columbus, IN 47202 | $8,683 |
112 | David Stafford | Hope, IN 47246 | $8,650 |
113 | Shawn Mcnealy | Hope, IN 47246 | $8,619 |
114 | Phillip E Harker | Flat Rock, IN 47234 | $8,552 |
115 | Ethan C Meyer | Columbus, IN 47201 | $8,423 |
116 | Joshua K Whipker | Elizabethtown, IN 47232 | $8,418 |
117 | Stallings Brothers Farms LLC | Indianapolis, IN 46237 | $8,060 |
118 | Buckingham Group II Limited Partnership | Columbus, IN 47201 | $8,011 |
119 | Philip Jordan | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $8,003 |
120 | Ronald Arnholt | Columbus, IN 47203 | $7,960 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”