Production Flexibility Program in Bartholomew County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 1,244
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Bartholomew County, Indiana totaled $18,728,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Larry Whipker | Columbus, IN 47201 | $29,895 |
162 | Henry J Whipker | Columbus, IN 47201 | $29,888 |
163 | David Mobley | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $29,840 |
164 | Linda O'connor | Columbus, IN 47203 | $29,597 |
165 | Ronald Peters | Columbus, IN 47201 | $29,530 |
166 | Larry L Thayer | Hope, IN 47246 | $29,313 |
167 | Lynn Jordan | Hartsville, IN 47244 | $29,173 |
168 | Michael L Wallace | Flat Rock, IN 47234 | $29,149 |
169 | Elizabeth R Nugent Trust | Bourbonnais, IL 60914 | $29,053 |
170 | David Pardieck | Columbus, IN 47201 | $28,892 |
171 | Driftwood Farms Corp | Columbus, IN 47202 | $28,765 |
172 | Richard Perry | Columbus, IN 47201 | $28,652 |
173 | Joseph G Arnholt | Columbus, IN 47203 | $28,572 |
174 | Branner Newsom Trust | Elizabethtown, IN 47232 | $28,512 |
175 | Edward Payne | Columbus, IN 47203 | $28,312 |
176 | Jeffrey G Shoaf | Hope, IN 47246 | $28,060 |
177 | David Loyd | Columbus, IN 47201 | $27,836 |
178 | Lester E Otte | Columbus, IN 47201 | $27,112 |
179 | Olympia Dairy Farm | Columbus, IN 47203 | $27,077 |
180 | Angela Fiesbeck | Edinburgh, IN 46124 | $26,784 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”