Farm Subsidy information
Bartholomew County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Bartholomew County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,486
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Bartholomew County, Indiana totaled $225,954,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Ed Engelau | Columbus, IN 47201 | $1,097,913 |
22 | Gregory Wayne Daily | Columbus, IN 47203 | $1,044,945 |
23 | Albert Suhre O'connor | Columbus, IN 47203 | $1,033,698 |
24 | Lynn-finkel-kellegha Karl Finkel | Jackson, WY 83002 | $1,031,011 |
25 | Kenmark Farms Inc | Columbus, IN 47201 | $1,015,090 |
26 | James Daily | Hope, IN 47246 | $1,005,891 |
27 | Carol Ann Daily | Hope, IN 47246 | $1,005,393 |
28 | Beacon Credit Union ** | Wabash, IN 46992 | $984,438 |
29 | Frank Henry Fiesbeck | Columbus, IN 47201 | $967,232 |
30 | Jason Engelau | Columbus, IN 47201 | $961,781 |
31 | Gelfius Farms Partnership | Hartsville, IN 47244 | $955,115 |
32 | Sudan Farms Inc | Columbus, IN 47203 | $954,863 |
33 | R Mike Yeley | Hope, IN 47246 | $949,151 |
34 | H-bar-h Incorporated | Bloomington, IN 47407 | $902,736 |
35 | Huffman Brothers Farms Inc | Columbus, IN 47203 | $898,267 |
36 | David D Romine | Columbus, IN 47203 | $893,126 |
37 | Michelle Jeanne Daily | Columbus, IN 47203 | $871,319 |
38 | Leroy Fiesbeck | Edinburgh, IN 46124 | $868,337 |
39 | Bruce K Nolting | Columbus, IN 47203 | $863,565 |
40 | David Fiesbeck | Edinburgh, IN 46124 | $856,902 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”