Farm Subsidy information
Bartholomew County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Bartholomew County, Indiana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 376
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Bartholomew County, Indiana totaled $7,202,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Marshall Middendorf | Columbus, IN 47201 | $155,611 |
2 | Lykins Farms | Columbus, IN 47201 | $126,507 |
3 | Pardieck & Son Farms LLC | Columbus, IN 47201 | $112,119 |
4 | Shane Charles Meier | Elizabethtown, IN 47232 | $79,377 |
5 | James Daily | Hope, IN 47246 | $79,231 |
6 | H&m Middendorf Farms | Columbus, IN 47201 | $78,795 |
7 | Kenmark Farms Inc | Columbus, IN 47201 | $62,580 |
8 | Michael L Kamman | Columbus, IN 47203 | $50,228 |
9 | Wehmeier Farms Inc | Columbus, IN 47201 | $44,092 |
10 | Barton Romine | Columbus, IN 47203 | $43,517 |
11 | Nancy Meyer | Columbus, IN 47201 | $38,962 |
12 | Lynn K Finkel-finkel-kelleghan Family Trust | Jackson, WY 83002 | $36,294 |
13 | Joshua K Whipker | Elizabethtown, IN 47232 | $34,988 |
14 | A & K Family Farms Inc | Columbus, IN 47203 | $34,579 |
15 | Greg Burbrink | Columbus, IN 47201 | $34,253 |
16 | Gary Meyer | Columbus, IN 47201 | $33,950 |
17 | L & C Burbrink Corp | Columbus, IN 47201 | $30,902 |
18 | Robert Finkel | Hope, IN 47246 | $28,326 |
19 | Louis Mensendiek | Columbus, IN 47201 | $27,620 |
20 | Craig A Bolte | Columbus, IN 47201 | $24,089 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>