Farm Subsidy information
Benton County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Benton County, Indiana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 500
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Benton County, Indiana totaled $7,794,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Berry Farms Of Fowler Inc | Fowler, IN 47944 | $19,871 |
22 | Srk Farms LLC | Lafayette, IN 47905 | $16,694 |
23 | , | $13,448 | |
24 | Wealing Farms LLC | Remington, IN 47977 | $12,905 |
25 | Maurice-neville Liv Trust-neville | Otterbein, IN 47970 | $12,679 |
26 | Dd Budreau Farms LLC | Fowler, IN 47944 | $12,603 |
27 | Senesac Farms Inc | Pine Village, IN 47975 | $12,463 |
28 | C Bryce Biddle | Remington, IN 47977 | $12,340 |
29 | Andrew Wallpe Heirs | Fowler, IN 47944 | $12,270 |
30 | Carlson & Condry Farms LLC | Boswell, IN 47921 | $12,154 |
31 | Jennie E Caldwell Trust | Earl Park, IN 47942 | $11,981 |
32 | Gregory L Johnson | West Lafayette, IN 47906 | $11,751 |
33 | Thomas D Suiter | Earl Park, IN 47942 | $11,560 |
34 | A&e Farms LLC | Wolcott, IN 47995 | $11,460 |
35 | Seven Hills Dairy LLC | Goodland, IN 47948 | $11,313 |
36 | Troy Hatke | Fowler, IN 47944 | $10,890 |
37 | Christopher Shepherd | Goodland, IN 47948 | $10,675 |
38 | J Patrick Nally | Fowler, IN 47944 | $10,606 |
39 | Heather Nally | Fowler, IN 47944 | $10,606 |
40 | Susan E Mccallister Revocable Living Trust | Pine Village, IN 47975 | $10,394 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”