Total Commodity Programs in Benton County, Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,515
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Benton County, Indiana totaled $231,581,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Suiter Farms Partnership | Earl Park, IN 47942 | $4,997,801 |
2 | Crossroad Farms | Williamsport, IN 47993 | $2,394,692 |
3 | W J Brost Farms Inc | Oxford, IN 47971 | $1,635,105 |
4 | David B Gick | Fowler, IN 47944 | $1,548,068 |
5 | Benton Dairy LLC | Ambia, IN 47917 | $1,453,092 |
6 | Buchanan Farms Partnership | Fowler, IN 47944 | $1,356,090 |
7 | Thomas D Suiter | Earl Park, IN 47942 | $1,325,443 |
8 | Bryan W Brost | Oxford, IN 47971 | $1,226,011 |
9 | Seven Hills Dairy LLC | Goodland, IN 47948 | $1,222,732 |
10 | Bruce Allen Buchanan | Fowler, IN 47944 | $1,179,468 |
11 | Berry Farms Of Fowler Inc | Fowler, IN 47944 | $1,124,855 |
12 | James R And Trudi K Souligne Caring Trust | Fowler, IN 47944 | $1,123,529 |
13 | Bonnie R Brost | Oxford, IN 47971 | $1,118,636 |
14 | Ronald J Gick | Fowler, IN 47944 | $1,106,148 |
15 | Creek Farms Inc | Remington, IN 47977 | $1,100,093 |
16 | Douglas M Morgan | Goodland, IN 47948 | $1,062,795 |
17 | Bradley James Hamilton | Earl Park, IN 47942 | $1,044,136 |
18 | Dennis Van Wanzeele | Otterbein, IN 47970 | $1,016,501 |
19 | Michael E Fischbach | Fowler, IN 47944 | $1,011,010 |
20 | Patricia M Suiter | Earl Park, IN 47942 | $998,820 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>