Loan Deficiency in Blackford County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 324
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Blackford County, Indiana totaled $7,736,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Robert E Goodspeed | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $30,235 |
62 | Craig D Gillis | Dunkirk, IN 47336 | $29,781 |
63 | Richard L Slentz | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $28,496 |
64 | Teddy D Tarr | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $28,344 |
65 | Paul Armstrong | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $27,211 |
66 | Jimmy D Rhoton | Montpelier, IN 47359 | $26,292 |
67 | Said Farms | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $26,261 |
68 | Francis Reidy | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $26,041 |
69 | Jack W Tapy Revocable Trust - Jac | Muncie, IN 47304 | $25,916 |
70 | C Walker Farm Part | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $25,668 |
71 | Kile D Clamme | Upland, IN 46989 | $25,503 |
72 | Jon Creek | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $25,461 |
73 | Ronald L Enochs | Marana, AZ 85658 | $25,130 |
74 | Garry Shroyer | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $25,039 |
75 | Thomas J Aulbach | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $24,895 |
76 | Hawk Farms | Muncie, IN 47303 | $24,477 |
77 | Lisa J Light | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $23,855 |
78 | Brian L Kitterman | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $23,243 |
79 | Karen Kitterman | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $23,112 |
80 | J Dwight Schmidt | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $22,262 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”