Loan Deficiency in Blackford County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 324
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Blackford County, Indiana totaled $7,736,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Van J Smith | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $13,505 |
102 | Ralph S Bantz | Dunkirk, IN 47336 | $13,276 |
103 | Jesse L Rogers | Warren, IN 46792 | $12,825 |
104 | Betty Jo Armstrong | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $12,445 |
105 | Ted Mccammon | Montpelier, IN 47359 | $11,940 |
106 | Ann H Overstreet | Enid, OK 73702 | $11,747 |
107 | Michael A Troyer | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $11,695 |
108 | Thomas F Hopkins | Merrillville, IN 46410 | $11,632 |
109 | Jerry Trant | Montpelier, IN 47359 | $11,507 |
110 | Dannie L & Judith Peck Morris Rev | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $11,394 |
111 | Clamme Bros | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $10,879 |
112 | Mark Mccardle | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $10,598 |
113 | James F Devoe | Carmel, IN 46032 | $10,573 |
114 | James P Trant | Montpelier, IN 47359 | $10,532 |
115 | Wilma Payne | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $10,221 |
116 | Brian West | Dunkirk, IN 47336 | $10,022 |
117 | Chester Avey | Pennville, IN 47369 | $10,005 |
118 | Mark L Aulbach | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $9,963 |
119 | Marth Walker Family Limited Partn | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $9,359 |
120 | Michael L Kellogg | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $9,061 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”