Farm Subsidy information
Blackford County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Blackford County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 998
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Blackford County, Indiana totaled $91,946,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Brad J Hile | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $85,322 |
122 | Ryan Bole | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $85,296 |
123 | Darrell Mccammon | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $83,641 |
124 | Brian L Kitterman | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $83,366 |
125 | Brian G Conner | Montpelier, IN 47359 | $82,145 |
126 | Richard L Slentz | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $81,318 |
127 | Linda Tarr | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $80,901 |
128 | Catherine H Decker | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $80,643 |
129 | Smoot Farms LLC | Eaton, IN 47338 | $80,503 |
130 | Jon Creek | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $79,292 |
131 | Charles A Coffee | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $77,507 |
132 | Harold Schuhmacher | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $76,702 |
133 | Sarah Garrett | Montpelier, IN 47359 | $76,330 |
134 | Kimberly A Quillen | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $74,615 |
135 | Philip G Jones | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $74,316 |
136 | Ted Mccammon | Montpelier, IN 47359 | $74,085 |
137 | Stanley Clamme | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $74,044 |
138 | Clamme Cattle Corp | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $73,632 |
139 | Mark L Aulbach | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $71,885 |
140 | Mark E Waldo | Fort Collins, CO 80528 | $70,152 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”