Farm Subsidy information
Clay County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Clay County, Indiana, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 223
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Clay County, Indiana totaled $4,235,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Jason Thomas | Brazil, IN 47834 | $1,791 |
42 | Marshall E Parks Living Trust | Terre Haute, IN 47805 | $1,712 |
43 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $1,657 |
44 | Zurcher Farms Inc | Brazil, IN 47834 | $1,510 |
45 | Gloria Ruhe Keystone Trust | Brazil, IN 47834 | $1,476 |
46 | Jerry L Purcell | Carbon, IN 47837 | $1,467 |
47 | Henry R Buell | Lewis, IN 47858 | $1,457 |
48 | Dustin L Gilbert | Lewis, IN 47858 | $1,219 |
49 | , | $1,185 | |
50 | Terry D Giltz | Centerpoint, IN 47840 | $1,143 |
51 | Robert W Romas | Centerpoint, IN 47840 | $1,140 |
52 | Joe Gerber | Clay City, IN 47841 | $1,138 |
53 | Roberta Inlow-roberta G Inlow Li | Shelbyville, IN 46176 | $1,110 |
54 | Melvin W Luther | Clay City, IN 47841 | $1,099 |
55 | John Walter Mallory | Indianapolis, IN 46239 | $1,095 |
56 | Scenic Hill Farm LLC | Rockville, IN 47872 | $1,076 |
57 | Rustin Rhodes | Clay City, IN 47841 | $1,053 |
58 | Keith E Jones | Jasonville, IN 47438 | $1,045 |
59 | Matthew Ryan Romas | Centerpoint, IN 47840 | $985 |
60 | Donald J Martin Jr | Clay City, IN 47841 | $933 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”