SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program in Clay County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 169
Recipients of SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program from farms in Clay County, Indiana totaled $3,495,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Mary Ellen Salyers | Terre Haute, IN 47804 | $2,459 |
122 | Lance E Anderson | Brazil, IN 47834 | $2,438 |
123 | Gerald E Hardesty | Lewis, IN 47858 | $2,327 |
124 | John Haviland | Coal City, IN 47427 | $2,290 |
125 | Melvin G Rogers | Cory, IN 47846 | $2,285 |
126 | Max L Modesitt | Brazil, IN 47834 | $2,161 |
127 | Vernilia Vest | Jasonville, IN 47438 | $2,051 |
128 | Dale Marrs | Clay City, IN 47841 | $2,003 |
129 | Edmond V Ray Jr | Bedford, IN 47421 | $1,643 |
130 | Leonard O Buell Estate | Bowling Green, IN 47833 | $1,629 |
131 | J Jeffrey Gerber | Clay City, IN 47841 | $1,518 |
132 | Norman Farmer | Jasonville, IN 47438 | $1,474 |
133 | John Troy Stanton | Brazil, IN 47834 | $1,359 |
134 | Fernie Marlow Trust | Greenwood, IN 46142 | $1,357 |
135 | Rosalind Smith | Tampa, FL 33613 | $1,267 |
136 | Deanne S Leohr | Brazil, IN 47834 | $1,259 |
137 | Aleda J Waggoner | Brazil, IN 47834 | $1,233 |
138 | Orris H Stark | Danbury, CT 06810 | $1,125 |
139 | Helen Warken Andres - Helen Warken Andres Rev Trus | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $1,120 |
140 | Willis Dyer | Clay City, IN 47841 | $1,108 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”