Loan Deficiency in Clay County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 1,929
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Clay County, Indiana totaled $20,836,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Charles D Meyer | Bowling Green, IN 47833 | $29,915 |
162 | Jordan D Trout | Brazil, IN 47834 | $29,683 |
163 | Louise Asbury Trust | Evansville, IN 47711 | $29,585 |
164 | Leland Zurcher Dec04 | Clay City, IN 47841 | $29,553 |
165 | Dale R Killion | Clay City, IN 47841 | $29,258 |
166 | Thomas R West | Poland, IN 47868 | $28,776 |
167 | Andre M Youngblood | Martinsville, IL 62442 | $28,587 |
168 | R Emmert Farms Inc | Brazil, IN 47834 | $27,927 |
169 | Mary Lou Knust Dietz Living Trust | Centerpoint, IN 47840 | $27,560 |
170 | Beryl Moore Dec05 | Brazil, IN 47834 | $27,109 |
171 | Wilburn H Rowe Trust | Jasonville, IN 47438 | $27,091 |
172 | Dennis Nevins | Brazil, IN 47834 | $26,873 |
173 | Barrett Farms | Cory, IN 47846 | $26,793 |
174 | Jerry R Seymour | Centerpoint, IN 47840 | $26,675 |
175 | David M Vitz | Centerpoint, IN 47840 | $26,299 |
176 | Douglas W Rehmel | Jasonville, IN 47438 | $26,154 |
177 | Terry David Staley | Clay City, IN 47841 | $25,836 |
178 | Melvin G Rogers | Cory, IN 47846 | $25,545 |
179 | Chester Stevenson | Brazil, IN 47834 | $25,527 |
180 | John T Gerber | Brazil, IN 47834 | $25,300 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”