Farm Subsidy information
Clay County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Clay County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,828
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Clay County, Indiana totaled $178,611,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Cooprider & Sons | Jasonville, IN 47438 | $2,684,379 |
2 | Stevenson Farms | Brazil, IN 47834 | $2,375,263 |
3 | Knust Farms Inc | Cory, IN 47846 | $1,741,026 |
4 | Nicoson Farms Inc | Cory, IN 47846 | $1,557,147 |
5 | Steven L Stoelting | Centerpoint, IN 47840 | $1,454,415 |
6 | Shidler Farms Inc | Lewis, IN 47858 | $1,287,833 |
7 | Gary Bunch | Centerpoint, IN 47840 | $1,235,058 |
8 | Joe Gerber | Clay City, IN 47841 | $1,201,465 |
9 | Riddell Farms | Brazil, IN 47834 | $1,194,048 |
10 | Jeffrey D Hyatt | Clay City, IN 47841 | $1,144,229 |
11 | Kenneth Sebastian | Spencer, IN 47460 | $1,062,621 |
12 | Ivan W Hofmann | Clay City, IN 47841 | $1,057,122 |
13 | Larry Backfish | Centerpoint, IN 47840 | $1,034,795 |
14 | Butts Dairy Farm LLC | Cory, IN 47846 | $1,022,503 |
15 | Kenneth Butts | Cory, IN 47846 | $946,825 |
16 | J Dean Hyatt | Clay City, IN 47841 | $929,394 |
17 | Casassa Dairy Farm Inc | Brazil, IN 47834 | $926,778 |
18 | Randall Tucker | Clay City, IN 47841 | $902,781 |
19 | Merrill Lynn Buell | Bowling Green, IN 47833 | $872,632 |
20 | Michael F Nussel | Brazil, IN 47834 | $848,614 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>