Total Commodity Programs in Clinton County, Indiana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 496
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Clinton County, Indiana totaled $3,823,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Gary L Neal | Frankfort, IN 46041 | $22,492 |
62 | Stinson & Stinson Inc | Frankfort, IN 46041 | $22,295 |
63 | Cochran Farms LLC | Colfax, IN 46035 | $21,871 |
64 | Karl L Dunn | Frankfort, IN 46041 | $21,050 |
65 | Hartman Farms LLC | Michigantown, IN 46057 | $20,670 |
66 | Bob K Mohler | Frankfort, IN 46041 | $20,199 |
67 | Emens Farms LLC | Frankfort, IN 46041 | $19,499 |
68 | Jerry M Neidlinger | Frankfort, IN 46041 | $19,365 |
69 | Charles Alan Dunn | Michigantown, IN 46057 | $19,274 |
70 | Ronald L Wainscott | Mulberry, IN 46058 | $18,966 |
71 | J Matthew Neal | Frankfort, IN 46041 | $18,908 |
72 | Johnson Ag Farms LLC | Clarks Hill, IN 47930 | $17,680 |
73 | Gsm Farms Inc | Kirklin, IN 46050 | $17,547 |
74 | Beard Management Corp | Frankfort, IN 46041 | $17,341 |
75 | Doyal Bell | Colfax, IN 46035 | $17,280 |
76 | Tom's Custom Application Inc | Frankfort, IN 46041 | $17,087 |
77 | Darren Pearson Farms Inc | Frankfort, IN 46041 | $16,961 |
78 | Bradley Bailey | Frankfort, IN 46041 | $16,806 |
79 | Neal Clark Farms LLC | Frankfort, IN 46041 | $16,690 |
80 | Richard J Smith | Frankfort, IN 46041 | $16,648 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”