Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Clinton County, Indiana, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 213

Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Clinton County, Indiana totaled $3,175,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE)
1995-2023
141W Ralph Shuck Testamentary Family TrustTipton, IN 46072$2,627
142Gilbert JonesGreen Bay, WI 54303$2,556
143Coplen Family Limited PartnershipLogansport, IN 46947$2,370
144Jerry SeagerMulberry, IN 46058$2,268
145Joseph Lahrman Farms IncMulberry, IN 46058$2,223
146Charles E Shelby - Charles E Shelby LLCLafayette, IN 47909$2,189
147Fred E Cragun TrustFrankfort, IN 46041$2,181
148Jane A KnappFrankfort, IN 46041$2,179
149Verlin SkilesRossville, IN 46065$2,149
150William Todd FoxMichigantown, IN 46057$2,136
151Melissa L FoxMichigantown, IN 46057$2,136
152Charles K SnellenbargerFrankfort, IN 46041$1,993
153Carolyn Wilson Caring TrustKokomo, IN 46902$1,987
154Illena Wilson Revocable TrustKirklin, IN 46050$1,987
155Giles StowersSheridan, IN 46069$1,809
156William L KelleyFrankfort, IN 46041$1,790
157Matthew L KelleyFrankfort, IN 46041$1,790
158Maryann JohnsonFrankfort, IN 46041$1,761
159D & K Wilson Farms LLCFrankfort, IN 46041$1,758
160Wagoner Farms IncMulberry, IN 46058$1,754

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag