Total Commodity Programs in Decatur County, Indiana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 506
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Decatur County, Indiana totaled $3,792,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Gary F Davis | Saint Paul, IN 47272 | $23,191 |
42 | Matthew J Diekhoff | Westport, IN 47283 | $22,120 |
43 | Holtkamp Family Land & Livestock Inc | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $21,865 |
44 | James Ortman | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $21,637 |
45 | Mike Koors | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $21,088 |
46 | Patric Grote | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $20,745 |
47 | David Curtis Vanderbur | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $20,405 |
48 | S & G Land LLC | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $19,304 |
49 | Compass Corner Farms Inc | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $19,212 |
50 | 1834 Evans Family Farms Inc | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $18,811 |
51 | Philip & Donald Kramer Partnership | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $18,371 |
52 | Brad Schutte | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $18,290 |
53 | Gauck Farms Inc | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $17,988 |
54 | William N Fogg | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $17,921 |
55 | William H Galloway | Westport, IN 47283 | $17,443 |
56 | S & A Schoettmer Inc | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $17,393 |
57 | Tom Crosby | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $17,387 |
58 | Swango Farms Inc | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $17,227 |
59 | Curtis C Hasselbring Farms LLC | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $17,193 |
60 | Stagge Farms Inc | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $17,140 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”