Farm Subsidy information
De Kalb County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in De Kalb County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 3,230
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in De Kalb County, Indiana totaled $192,722,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | John I Harrison | Butler, IN 46721 | $487,054 |
62 | Clifford Farms LLC | Auburn, IN 46706 | $467,639 |
63 | Dennis L Zeisloft | Auburn, IN 46706 | $457,323 |
64 | Rita A Berryhill | Corunna, IN 46730 | $456,540 |
65 | Tim Griffin | Garrett, IN 46738 | $456,254 |
66 | Duwayne Goings | Auburn, IN 46706 | $445,840 |
67 | Terry Dale Yarde | Garrett, IN 46738 | $441,968 |
68 | Thornton Zeisloft | Auburn, IN 46706 | $439,594 |
69 | Phe LLC | Garrett, IN 46738 | $438,539 |
70 | Troyer Meadows Inc | Ashley, IN 46705 | $437,403 |
71 | Bruce A Laub | Saint Joe, IN 46785 | $429,909 |
72 | U/w Willard Shambaugh First Merch | Fort Wayne, IN 46802 | $428,885 |
73 | James M Haynes | Garrett, IN 46738 | $426,345 |
74 | Robert Melvin Hurraw | Hamilton, IN 46742 | $423,920 |
75 | Kevin Robert Bowman | Waterloo, IN 46793 | $420,898 |
76 | Hook Farms Inc | Butler, IN 46721 | $417,345 |
77 | William Van Wye | Ashley, IN 46705 | $404,388 |
78 | Creager Calves LLC | Auburn, IN 46706 | $401,776 |
79 | Aschleman Farms Inc | Auburn, IN 46706 | $400,227 |
80 | Prosser Farms LLC | Butler, IN 46721 | $377,406 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”