Conservation Reserve Program in De Kalb County, Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,708
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in De Kalb County, Indiana totaled $46,315,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Steury Brothers Construction Co Stateline Farms | Spencerville, IN 46788 | $917,330 |
2 | Larry W Seiler | Auburn, IN 46706 | $555,332 |
3 | U/w Willard Shambaugh First Merch | Fort Wayne, IN 46802 | $427,947 |
4 | Thornton Zeisloft | Auburn, IN 46706 | $405,275 |
5 | Holman Farms Inc | Saint Joe, IN 46785 | $364,189 |
6 | Lela Keesler | Saint Joe, IN 46785 | $339,629 |
7 | Florin Knox | Auburn, IN 46706 | $321,774 |
8 | Jon D Carpenter | Spencerville, IN 46788 | $304,497 |
9 | Robert S Hart | Fort Pierce, FL 34949 | $300,208 |
10 | Larry Redmon | New Haven, IN 46774 | $294,757 |
11 | Lewis Steury Revocable Trust | Spencerville, IN 46788 | $290,952 |
12 | Karen K Baker | Saint Joe, IN 46785 | $276,723 |
13 | Marvin Douglas Presley | Hamilton, IN 46742 | $268,282 |
14 | William Platt | Kendallville, IN 46755 | $259,941 |
15 | W Alan Scranage | Ashley, IN 46705 | $248,094 |
16 | Melvin Steury | Saint Joe, IN 46785 | $242,080 |
17 | Mayer Development Corp | Butler, IN 46721 | $227,642 |
18 | James W Stahl | Kendallville, IN 46755 | $221,090 |
19 | Donna R Colburn | Kendallville, IN 46755 | $220,618 |
20 | Robert Melvin Hurraw | Hamilton, IN 46742 | $214,566 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>