Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Dubois County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 437
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Dubois County, Indiana totaled $8,668,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Terrence C Gress | Jasper, IN 47546 | $30,873 |
82 | Kalb Family Grain LLC | Dubois, IN 47527 | $30,691 |
83 | Norbert Begle Farms Inc | Huntingburg, IN 47542 | $30,257 |
84 | Roger Sermersheim | Saint Anthony, IN 47575 | $30,007 |
85 | Seminole Stone Inc | Jasper, IN 47546 | $29,947 |
86 | Schwenk Grain Farms LLC | Jasper, IN 47546 | $29,388 |
87 | Jeff Stenftenagel | Jasper, IN 47546 | $29,109 |
88 | Berg & Sons Farm Inc | Saint Anthony, IN 47575 | $28,817 |
89 | G And J Farm LLC | Jasper, IN 47546 | $28,514 |
90 | Daniel Sendelweck | Jasper, IN 47546 | $28,058 |
91 | J & S Hasenour Farms LLC | Huntingburg, IN 47542 | $27,753 |
92 | Eldon Jack Kamman | Huntingburg, IN 47542 | $27,229 |
93 | F & J Luebbehusen Farms LLC | Ferdinand, IN 47532 | $26,920 |
94 | Brad Knies | Celestine, IN 47521 | $26,269 |
95 | Seger Family LLC | Jasper, IN 47546 | $26,101 |
96 | Rudolph Farm Inc | Jasper, IN 47546 | $24,598 |
97 | Temple Brothers | Jasper, IN 47546 | $24,350 |
98 | Glenn Goeppner | Jasper, IN 47546 | $24,038 |
99 | James Hasenour | Dubois, IN 47527 | $23,754 |
100 | Joseph Werner | Ferdinand, IN 47532 | $23,728 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”