Farm Subsidy information
Elkhart County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Elkhart County, Indiana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 393
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Elkhart County, Indiana totaled $5,812,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Bobeck Acres Inc | Syracuse, IN 46567 | $32,531 |
42 | Dean Kronk | Elkhart, IN 46517 | $32,528 |
43 | Warner Farms Inc | Goshen, IN 46528 | $31,860 |
44 | Bryan Sheets | Nappanee, IN 46550 | $31,629 |
45 | Robert E Geiger-pergrem | Syracuse, IN 46567 | $31,115 |
46 | Holdeman Farms Inc | Wakarusa, IN 46573 | $31,044 |
47 | Loyal Acres Inc | Middlebury, IN 46540 | $30,920 |
48 | Dennis W Paulus | Elkhart, IN 46517 | $29,665 |
49 | Palmate Farm LLC | Goshen, IN 46528 | $29,063 |
50 | Showalter Farms Inc | Goshen, IN 46526 | $28,625 |
51 | Maple Crest Farms Inc | Elkhart, IN 46517 | $27,908 |
52 | Crystal Valley Log Homes LLC Dba Baugo Creek Farm | Wakarusa, IN 46573 | $27,229 |
53 | Beacon Credit Union ** | Wabash, IN 46992 | $27,079 |
54 | Dennis L Blosser | Nappanee, IN 46550 | $26,746 |
55 | Steve Landis | Goshen, IN 46526 | $25,180 |
56 | Delvin R Mast | Middlebury, IN 46540 | $24,571 |
57 | A William Jessup | Goshen, IN 46526 | $24,091 |
58 | James S Frey | Goshen, IN 46526 | $23,425 |
59 | Zimmerman Farms LLC | Goshen, IN 46528 | $23,274 |
60 | Spring Valley Farms Partnership | Middlebury, IN 46540 | $21,860 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”