Farm Subsidy information
Elkhart County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Elkhart County, Indiana, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 107
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Elkhart County, Indiana totaled $3,495,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Steven S Kauffman | Goshen, IN 46528 | $3,280 |
42 | Jim Cripe | Syracuse, IN 46567 | $3,151 |
43 | John D Ulmer | Goshen, IN 46526 | $2,986 |
44 | Alexander J Phillips | Bristol, IN 46507 | $2,855 |
45 | Gary K Kauffman | Millersburg, IN 46543 | $2,781 |
46 | Brookins Farms LLC | New Paris, IN 46553 | $2,772 |
47 | Pine Crest Farms Inc | Goshen, IN 46528 | $2,672 |
48 | Showalter Farms Inc | Goshen, IN 46526 | $2,623 |
49 | Paul D Phillips | Bristol, IN 46507 | $2,613 |
50 | Purdue Research Foundation | West Lafayette, IN 47906 | $2,410 |
51 | Baugo Creek Farm LLC Fka Crystal Valley Log Homes | Wakarusa, IN 46573 | $2,320 |
52 | Glenn A Nunemaker | Wakarusa, IN 46573 | $2,309 |
53 | Rick Kauffman | Goshen, IN 46528 | $2,273 |
54 | Ernest L & Timothy D Stoltzfus Ptr Prairie Dairy F | Goshen, IN 46526 | $2,162 |
55 | Ronald J Snider | Millersburg, IN 46543 | $2,116 |
56 | Jason Miller | Nappanee, IN 46550 | $2,085 |
57 | Carl Schrock | Syracuse, IN 46567 | $2,067 |
58 | , | $1,813 | |
59 | James R Garber | New Paris, IN 46553 | $1,785 |
60 | Rolland Eby | Elkhart, IN 46517 | $1,635 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”