Farm Subsidy information
Elkhart County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Elkhart County, Indiana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 121
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Elkhart County, Indiana totaled $2,799,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Dana B Mathews | New Paris, IN 46553 | $128,987 |
2 | Timothy L Miller | White Pigeon, MI 49099 | $119,297 |
3 | Adam Ramer | New Paris, IN 46553 | $72,175 |
4 | Natural Family Farms, LLC | Middlebury, IN 46540 | $58,776 |
5 | Chad Zahner | Wakarusa, IN 46573 | $53,290 |
6 | A William Jessup | Goshen, IN 46526 | $53,057 |
7 | , | $44,775 | |
8 | Warner Farms Inc | Goshen, IN 46528 | $41,602 |
9 | Paul D Phillips | Bristol, IN 46507 | $39,116 |
10 | Sunrise Orchards Inc | Goshen, IN 46526 | $32,904 |
11 | John W Phillips | Bristol, IN 46507 | $28,704 |
12 | Alexander J Phillips | Bristol, IN 46507 | $28,431 |
13 | Weybright Farms L L C | Syracuse, IN 46567 | $17,425 |
14 | Zimmerman Farms LLC | Goshen, IN 46528 | $16,766 |
15 | Baugo Creek Farm LLC Fka Crystal Valley Log Homes | Wakarusa, IN 46573 | $15,465 |
16 | Jeremy Weaver | Wakarusa, IN 46573 | $10,832 |
17 | Jonathon P Burkey | Wakarusa, IN 46573 | $10,628 |
18 | Maple Branch Farms Inc | Middlebury, IN 46540 | $10,452 |
19 | Oneeda Farms LLC | Syracuse, IN 46567 | $10,452 |
20 | Timothy R Martin | Osceola, IN 46561 | $10,452 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>