Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Franklin County, Indiana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 144
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Franklin County, Indiana totaled $54,376 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | John David Bonham | Hamilton, OH 45011 | $347 |
42 | Michael N Biltz | Batesville, IN 47006 | $339 |
43 | Robert J Ripperger | Metamora, IN 47030 | $335 |
44 | Roy Rosenberger | Brookville, IN 47012 | $325 |
45 | Dale & Glenn Bergman | Sunman, IN 47041 | $314 |
46 | Lawrence Bedel | Oldenburg, IN 47036 | $311 |
47 | Scheele Operating LLC | Batesville, IN 47006 | $308 |
48 | James R Merrell | Brookville, IN 47012 | $305 |
49 | Patrick R Bedel | Batesville, IN 47006 | $300 |
50 | Roy Meyer | Batesville, IN 47006 | $297 |
51 | John A Meyer | Batesville, IN 47006 | $297 |
52 | Brandon Wolter | Rushville, IN 46173 | $284 |
53 | Michael A Volk | Batesville, IN 47006 | $282 |
54 | Dale Beck | Rushville, IN 46173 | $270 |
55 | A & B Thompson Family Farm LLC | Brookville, IN 47012 | $262 |
56 | Gary Merkel | Batesville, IN 47006 | $254 |
57 | James L Knecht | West Harrison, IN 47060 | $249 |
58 | Daryl Kramer | Brookville, IN 47012 | $238 |
59 | John Precht | Connersville, IN 47331 | $237 |
60 | Norbert Nobbe | Batesville, IN 47006 | $237 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”