Farm Subsidy information
Gibson County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Gibson County, Indiana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 174
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Gibson County, Indiana totaled $12,812,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Sharon A Wallis | Wheaton, IL 60187 | $4,845 |
42 | Jeffrey Marion Koberstein Jr | Patoka, IN 47666 | $4,682 |
43 | Mary C Ford | Peachtree City, GA 30269 | $4,606 |
44 | Sam Muncy | Francisco, IN 47649 | $4,603 |
45 | Dennis M Simpson | Owensville, IN 47665 | $4,436 |
46 | Marvel Family Farms Inc | Princeton, IN 47670 | $4,408 |
47 | Mary Mckinney | Francisco, IN 47649 | $4,361 |
48 | Muncy Farms Inc | Francisco, IN 47649 | $3,953 |
49 | Hovorka Scott Farms LLC | Owensville, IN 47665 | $3,684 |
50 | Chris Kivett | Chandler, IN 47610 | $3,680 |
51 | Daniel Lamey | Haubstadt, IN 47639 | $3,362 |
52 | Ethan Wayne Ireland | Oakland City, IN 47660 | $3,320 |
53 | Mike T Wood | Princeton, IN 47670 | $3,280 |
54 | Anthony J Keil | Elberfeld, IN 47613 | $3,233 |
55 | Kent Lamey | Haubstadt, IN 47639 | $3,229 |
56 | Vincent Georges & Sons Inc | Fort Branch, IN 47648 | $3,205 |
57 | Rebecca Partenheimer | Princeton, IN 47670 | $3,114 |
58 | Deborah L Ford | Patoka, IN 47666 | $3,113 |
59 | Stunkel Family Farms LLC | Haubstadt, IN 47639 | $2,790 |
60 | Hunter Carter | Decker, IN 47524 | $2,677 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”