Total Conservation Programs in Gibson County, Indiana, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 92
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Gibson County, Indiana totaled $128,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | G & S Pohl Farm Inc | Haubstadt, IN 47639 | $342 |
62 | Brian R Rexing | Fort Branch, IN 47648 | $339 |
63 | Judy Workman | Patoka, IN 47666 | $333 |
64 | Jerry W And Judith A Phillips Joint Rev Trust | Oakland City, IN 47660 | $330 |
65 | William A Freeman Jr | Louisville, KY 40222 | $321 |
66 | Kevin V Kramer | Patoka, IN 47666 | $310 |
67 | David Cromer | Oakland City, IN 47660 | $284 |
68 | D Craig Pflug | Oakland City, IN 47660 | $278 |
69 | Rodney Allen Schmidt | Lynnville, IN 47619 | $272 |
70 | Daniel J Lefler | Francisco, IN 47649 | $269 |
71 | Kent Lamey | Haubstadt, IN 47639 | $255 |
72 | Norma-norma A Regener Revocable Trust Regener | Haubstadt, IN 47639 | $240 |
73 | Rvoc Living Tr Of Marvin D Smith And Thelma V Smit | Oakland City, IN 47660 | $188 |
74 | Obert Brothers Farms LLC | Fort Branch, IN 47648 | $168 |
75 | Nancy Oeswein | Rochester, MI 48307 | $160 |
76 | Laura Greenwell | Louisville, KY 40220 | $160 |
77 | Marilou Stilwell | Francisco, IN 47649 | $147 |
78 | Roger F And Robin A Sermersheim Family Trust | Oakland City, IN 47660 | $142 |
79 | John Bertram | Newburgh, IN 47630 | $105 |
80 | David Bertram | Lexington, KY 40509 | $105 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”