Farm Subsidy information
Gibson County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Gibson County, Indiana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 938
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Gibson County, Indiana totaled $16,188,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Jeffrey Marion Koberstein Jr | Patoka, IN 47666 | $15,596 |
102 | Eldon L Mutchman | Elberfeld, IN 47613 | $15,166 |
103 | John Mutchman | Elberfeld, IN 47613 | $15,166 |
104 | Gary Pleiss | Princeton, IN 47670 | $15,091 |
105 | Brent Stader | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $14,911 |
106 | German American Bank ** | Columbus, IN 47201 | $14,380 |
107 | Alan Kruse | Fort Branch, IN 47648 | $14,288 |
108 | Terry C Kruse | Fort Branch, IN 47648 | $14,288 |
109 | Jeffrey Keith Brenton | Petersburg, IN 47567 | $14,274 |
110 | Mrd Farms LLC | Oakland City, IN 47660 | $14,209 |
111 | Kevin V Kramer | Patoka, IN 47666 | $13,923 |
112 | Wayne E Anderson | Owensville, IN 47665 | $12,749 |
113 | Brian L Elpers | Evansville, IN 47720 | $12,563 |
114 | S & M Holsteins- Mark Tenbarge | Haubstadt, IN 47639 | $12,496 |
115 | Larry Kruse | Princeton, IN 47670 | $12,447 |
116 | Richard Hasenour | Fort Branch, IN 47648 | $12,175 |
117 | Jeff Chandler | Patoka, IN 47666 | $11,727 |
118 | Hovorka Scott Farms LLC | Owensville, IN 47665 | $11,446 |
119 | Rick Kruse | Fort Branch, IN 47648 | $11,382 |
120 | Timothy C Kruse | Fort Branch, IN 47648 | $11,382 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”