Counter Cyclical Program in Gibson County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,476
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Gibson County, Indiana totaled $7,750,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Larry Pflug | Oakland City, IN 47660 | $62,276 |
22 | Bryan A Hirsch | Fort Branch, IN 47648 | $60,671 |
23 | Gene A Pflug | Oakland City, IN 47660 | $59,968 |
24 | Donald E Hale | Owensville, IN 47665 | $59,936 |
25 | Arnold Michel & Sons | Fort Branch, IN 47648 | $59,566 |
26 | Kruse Farms Inc | Fort Branch, IN 47648 | $58,722 |
27 | Steelman Farms Inc | Patoka, IN 47666 | $58,562 |
28 | Edward Mason | Owensville, IN 47665 | $58,381 |
29 | David L Haase Revocable Trust | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $56,167 |
30 | Chamberlain Farm Produce Inc | Owensville, IN 47665 | $55,626 |
31 | Melvin Raye Ziliak | Fort Branch, IN 47648 | $55,552 |
32 | Marvel Family Farms Inc | Princeton, IN 47670 | $53,855 |
33 | Michael J Hirsch | Fort Branch, IN 47648 | $52,688 |
34 | Ronald D Hudson | Patoka, IN 47666 | $52,518 |
35 | Robert M Bender Dba Robert M Bender Farm | Fort Branch, IN 47648 | $52,110 |
36 | Stephen W Marvel | Princeton, IN 47670 | $50,592 |
37 | Marion Jochim | Owensville, IN 47665 | $49,807 |
38 | Robert Townsend | Princeton, IN 47670 | $49,603 |
39 | Wm Clark Bugher | Patoka, IN 47666 | $48,406 |
40 | Stephen Alan Douglas | Princeton, IN 47670 | $47,569 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”