Farm Subsidy information
Henry County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Henry County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 2,134
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Henry County, Indiana totaled $236,670,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Paul Buchmeier | Yorktown, IN 47396 | $695,276 |
62 | Kade Koger | New Castle, IN 47362 | $693,801 |
63 | Matthew Ritchie Chapman | Springport, IN 47386 | $685,491 |
64 | Luther Upchurch And Marilyn Upchu | New Castle, IN 47362 | $681,980 |
65 | Ronald K Lowhorn | New Castle, IN 47362 | $673,297 |
66 | Brian D Miller | Spiceland, IN 47385 | $667,028 |
67 | Kristi Koger | New Castle, IN 47362 | $659,488 |
68 | Jeffrey A Sanders | Middletown, IN 47356 | $657,013 |
69 | Dale French | New Castle, IN 47362 | $656,050 |
70 | Jacob Chapman | Middletown, IN 47356 | $643,338 |
71 | James R Foulke | Hagerstown, IN 47346 | $642,649 |
72 | Haase Farms Inc | Knightstown, IN 46148 | $638,527 |
73 | Tri W Farms Inc | Springport, IN 47386 | $634,289 |
74 | Doug Kinder | Straughn, IN 47387 | $632,353 |
75 | Larry Bever | Spiceland, IN 47385 | $631,942 |
76 | Mike Higgs | Springport, IN 47386 | $623,338 |
77 | Paula K Chapman | Middletown, IN 47356 | $609,076 |
78 | Brian Becker | Middletown, IN 47356 | $607,417 |
79 | Richard King | New Castle, IN 47362 | $603,731 |
80 | Marti Armstrong | New Castle, IN 47362 | $587,219 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”