Conservation Reserve Program in Henry County, Indiana, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 130
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Henry County, Indiana totaled $238,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Deborah Magiera | Straughn, IN 47387 | $329 |
102 | Steven Mark Goggin | Cambridge City, IN 47327 | $328 |
103 | , | $326 | |
104 | Kathy Kalia Revocable Trust | Mount Summit, IN 47361 | $307 |
105 | Thomas James Pfaff | Straughn, IN 47387 | $276 |
106 | Dale Pierce | New Castle, IN 47362 | $259 |
107 | Ron Thompson Jr | New Castle, IN 47362 | $243 |
108 | Randy Kern | Noblesville, IN 46062 | $237 |
109 | Carl Duane Kern | New Castle, IN 47362 | $230 |
110 | Rodney K Kern | Kokomo, IN 46901 | $230 |
111 | Ronald Chew | Straughn, IN 47387 | $200 |
112 | Allen Mills | New Castle, IN 47362 | $200 |
113 | Jeff W Mckinsey | Losantville, IN 47354 | $191 |
114 | Rainey Farms LLC | Hanover, IN 47243 | $190 |
115 | Karen K Vise | Knightstown, IN 46148 | $183 |
116 | Ernest Eugene Warner & Patti L Warner Family Trust | Yorktown, IN 47396 | $166 |
117 | Jim Pentecost | Connersville, IN 47331 | $158 |
118 | Henry Pentecost Jr | Milton, IN 47357 | $158 |
119 | Priscilla Willett | Falmouth, IN 46127 | $158 |
120 | Linda Farrington | Lewisville, IN 47352 | $150 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”