Farm Subsidy information
Jackson County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Jackson County, Indiana, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 758
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Jackson County, Indiana totaled $13,421,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Beacon Credit Union ** | Wabash, IN 46992 | $1,422,293 |
2 | David Otting | Medora, IN 47260 | $271,974 |
3 | Newkirk Inc | Seymour, IN 47274 | $167,073 |
4 | Bourbon Bound Farms LLC | Brownstown, IN 47220 | $145,637 |
5 | Gregory D Mcpike | Medora, IN 47260 | $135,750 |
6 | Rothert Farms Inc | Seymour, IN 47274 | $133,845 |
7 | Agri Business Finance ** | St Paris, OH 43072 | $125,819 |
8 | Burcham Farm Service Inc. | Vallonia, IN 47281 | $124,618 |
9 | Steve Wischmeier | Brownstown, IN 47220 | $122,990 |
10 | Beth Wischmeier | Brownstown, IN 47220 | $122,988 |
11 | Myers Sod Farm LLC | Seymour, IN 47274 | $114,288 |
12 | Wischmeier Family Farms Inc | Seymour, IN 47274 | $109,854 |
13 | Max Klosterman | Brownstown, IN 47220 | $108,444 |
14 | Clayton Klosterman | Seymour, IN 47274 | $105,417 |
15 | Fred C Harrison | Medora, IN 47260 | $102,593 |
16 | Bruce A Shoemaker | Vallonia, IN 47281 | $101,846 |
17 | B&a Thompson Grain Farm Inc | Seymour, IN 47274 | $94,508 |
18 | Jdw Farms Inc | Seymour, IN 47274 | $94,444 |
19 | Doug Fish | Seymour, IN 47274 | $91,301 |
20 | Michael D Wehmiller | Seymour, IN 47274 | $84,410 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>