Conservation Reserve Program in Jasper County, Indiana, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 259
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Jasper County, Indiana totaled $1,042,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Kohlhagen Family LLC | Rensselaer, IN 47978 | $2,370 |
102 | Matthew Anderson | Rensselaer, IN 47978 | $2,319 |
103 | Chad Anderson | Miami, FL 33146 | $2,319 |
104 | Richard Ruman | Rensselaer, IN 47978 | $2,305 |
105 | Joanne Ziese | Rensselaer, IN 47978 | $2,265 |
106 | Torbet Farms LLC | Rensselaer, IN 47978 | $2,218 |
107 | Stephen Anderson | Rensselaer, IN 47978 | $2,202 |
108 | Carol A Simmons | Rensselaer, IN 47978 | $2,183 |
109 | Nagel Deer Farm 1959 LLC | Rensselaer, IN 47978 | $2,166 |
110 | Ivanka Tomich | Muskego, WI 53150 | $2,160 |
111 | Dan Ritter | Rensselaer, IN 47978 | $2,160 |
112 | Alvin Hoffman | Demotte, IN 46310 | $2,158 |
113 | Wilma J Lehe | Remington, IN 47977 | $2,128 |
114 | Larry Berenda | Mount Ayr, IN 47964 | $1,975 |
115 | Nikole D Risner-cain | Rensselaer, IN 47978 | $1,960 |
116 | , | $1,941 | |
117 | Michael V Ratcliff | Rensselaer, IN 47978 | $1,938 |
118 | Mark Amsler | Monticello, IN 47960 | $1,932 |
119 | , | $1,912 | |
120 | Markland Family Limited Partnership | Wheatfield, IN 46392 | $1,910 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”