Counter Cyclical Program in Jennings County, Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 659
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Jennings County, Indiana totaled $2,782,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Roger Maschino | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $27,992 |
22 | Nathan D Burbrink | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $27,248 |
23 | Kenmark Farms Inc | Columbus, IN 47201 | $27,053 |
24 | Leonard Maschino | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $27,031 |
25 | D J Branham Inc | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $25,623 |
26 | David Schepman Farms Inc | Brownstown, IN 47220 | $25,380 |
27 | Trent Thomas Low | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $25,282 |
28 | Daniel L Speer | Holton, IN 47023 | $24,814 |
29 | Richard Mcfall | Scipio, IN 47273 | $24,751 |
30 | Louis Wischmeier | Columbus, IN 47201 | $24,662 |
31 | Gilbert E Vogel | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $24,438 |
32 | Mike A Nelson | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $24,097 |
33 | Diekhoff Farms LLC | Westport, IN 47283 | $24,080 |
34 | William J Bloemer | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $23,917 |
35 | Dwayne L Sporleder | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $23,312 |
36 | Michael Coons | Butlerville, IN 47223 | $23,160 |
37 | Larry Maschino | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $22,765 |
38 | Garry Barker | Columbus, IN 47203 | $21,988 |
39 | William R Hendrix | Paris Crossing, IN 47270 | $21,789 |
40 | Nelson Ponsler | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $21,152 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”