Counter Cyclical Program in Knox County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 990
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Knox County, Indiana totaled $9,438,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Huey Enterprises Inc | Sandborn, IN 47578 | $52,344 |
42 | Guy Debord & Sons Farms Inc | Wheatland, IN 47597 | $52,262 |
43 | Summers Indian Creek Farms LLC | Bicknell, IN 47512 | $52,228 |
44 | Michael J Hagemeier | Bruceville, IN 47516 | $51,950 |
45 | Jackson Ltd | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $49,812 |
46 | Marchino Farms LLC | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $49,794 |
47 | Mary Louise Hess | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $49,732 |
48 | Kent Wolfe | Oaktown, IN 47561 | $49,536 |
49 | Vieke Farms Inc | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $49,419 |
50 | L & R Rusch Farms Inc | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $49,079 |
51 | Robert H Summers & Sons Inc | Edwardsport, IN 47528 | $46,536 |
52 | Mcclure Farms Inc | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $46,063 |
53 | Apple Farms LLC | Oaktown, IN 47561 | $45,115 |
54 | Janis Ice | Bicknell, IN 47512 | $44,827 |
55 | Williams And Scott | Oaktown, IN 47561 | $44,670 |
56 | Schroeder Family Fms Inc | Westphalia, IN 47596 | $44,184 |
57 | Jerry W Cardinal | Oaktown, IN 47561 | $43,631 |
58 | Daniel Mackey | Bicknell, IN 47512 | $43,478 |
59 | Dennis Mouzin | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $43,458 |
60 | Kelly W Mason | Oaktown, IN 47561 | $43,295 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”