Conservation Reserve Program in Knox County, Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 519
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Knox County, Indiana totaled $12,892,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Dr Henry J Matick | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $439,986 |
2 | Dale & Dennis Newton LLC | Bruceville, IN 47516 | $335,250 |
3 | James G Main Living Trust | Avon, IN 46123 | $317,092 |
4 | Mary Louise Hess | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $303,095 |
5 | Anson Brothers | Monroe City, IN 47557 | $297,437 |
6 | Kathryn J Linneweber | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $275,363 |
7 | Wallace Linneweber | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $274,624 |
8 | Field Farms Inc | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $273,195 |
9 | Julie A Edwards | Monroe City, IN 47557 | $233,087 |
10 | Brad Montgomery | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $232,977 |
11 | The Adams Family Trust | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $226,911 |
12 | Ray Mccormick | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $195,046 |
13 | W Lowell Carnahan & Sons Inc | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $194,554 |
14 | Cletus R Hess | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $188,215 |
15 | Judy J Sutton | Monroe City, IN 47557 | $183,462 |
16 | Timothy B Sutton | Monroe City, IN 47557 | $180,159 |
17 | Kelly Mason And Sons LLC | Oaktown, IN 47561 | $166,971 |
18 | Mccormick Farms Inc | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $165,903 |
19 | Richard A Lowery Revocable Trust | Fishers, IN 46037 | $161,258 |
20 | Oexmann & Hacker Farms LLC | Decker, IN 47524 | $138,454 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>