Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Kosciusko County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 307
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Kosciusko County, Indiana totaled $6,529,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | Duane Shepherd | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $4,270 |
182 | Jonathon Little | Silver Lake, IN 46982 | $4,178 |
183 | Levi Joseph Christman | North Manchester, IN 46962 | $4,178 |
184 | E & M Hollar Farms Inc | Milford, IN 46542 | $4,024 |
185 | Russell Hollar Jr | Milford, IN 46542 | $3,883 |
186 | Steven L Frecker | Leesburg, IN 46538 | $3,823 |
187 | Steven Landrigan | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $3,786 |
188 | Mock LLC | Syracuse, IN 46567 | $3,744 |
189 | Jeffrey R Parker | Claypool, IN 46510 | $3,420 |
190 | Robert Lane Tusing | Leesburg, IN 46538 | $3,350 |
191 | Rodney Hollar | Milford, IN 46542 | $3,340 |
192 | Greg Kaiser | Milford, IN 46542 | $3,199 |
193 | Mike & Tim Whetstone LLC | Mentone, IN 46539 | $3,164 |
194 | Cripe & Company Inc | Claypool, IN 46510 | $3,099 |
195 | Todd M Nelson | Claypool, IN 46510 | $3,093 |
196 | Stanley Miller | Akron, IN 46910 | $3,088 |
197 | Thomas Lee Grall | Nappanee, IN 46550 | $3,048 |
198 | Menifee Patrick | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $2,993 |
199 | Mikaela Marie Bixler | Claypool, IN 46510 | $2,884 |
200 | Gene Miller | Akron, IN 46910 | $2,835 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”