Market Loss Assistance Program in Kosciusko County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,204
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Kosciusko County, Indiana totaled $11,081,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Tucker Farms | Mentone, IN 46539 | $65,573 |
42 | Larry Burnworth | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $64,044 |
43 | Michael Nelson | Burket, IN 46508 | $63,387 |
44 | Templin Farms Inc | Leesburg, IN 46538 | $61,882 |
45 | Doyle Munson Farms Inc | Warsaw, IN 46580 | $58,714 |
46 | Carl Sands & Sons Inc | Silver Lake, IN 46982 | $58,436 |
47 | George's Grain Farm Inc | Nappanee, IN 46550 | $57,880 |
48 | James A Romine | Mentone, IN 46539 | $56,379 |
49 | Jesse E Berger | Nappanee, IN 46550 | $55,709 |
50 | Michael E Williamson | Etna Green, IN 46524 | $55,165 |
51 | M Garwin Eaton | Mentone, IN 46539 | $53,890 |
52 | Lee Beer Farms Inc | Milford, IN 46542 | $52,879 |
53 | Thomas A Smith Revocable Trust | Warsaw, IN 46582 | $50,959 |
54 | John Moneyheffer | Leesburg, IN 46538 | $48,598 |
55 | Lloyd Tillman | Claypool, IN 46510 | $44,008 |
56 | Jim R Hettler | Claypool, IN 46510 | $44,007 |
57 | Mike Zimmerman Jr | Milford, IN 46542 | $43,856 |
58 | Hubert Krull | Milford, IN 46542 | $43,548 |
59 | Metzger Cattle Co | Claypool, IN 46510 | $43,360 |
60 | Todd L Hoffman | Silver Lake, IN 46982 | $43,101 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”