Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Kosciusko County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 54
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Kosciusko County, Indiana totaled $629,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Tom Farms LLC | Leesburg, IN 46538 | $103,843 |
2 | C & C Tucker Farms Llp | Mentone, IN 46539 | $94,671 |
3 | Max Deatsman | Leesburg, IN 46538 | $73,121 |
4 | Tom Farms Partners | Leesburg, IN 46538 | $51,130 |
5 | Eipc LLC | Port Washington, WI 53074 | $46,608 |
6 | J A Scott Farms Inc | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $42,913 |
7 | Creighton Brothers LLC | Atwood, IN 46502 | $30,891 |
8 | John P Lash & Darlene M Lash Rev | Mentone, IN 46539 | $23,250 |
9 | Vana Dell Farms Inc | Warsaw, IN 46580 | $15,770 |
10 | Sam Beer Farms Inc | Milford, IN 46542 | $9,046 |
11 | Ransbottom Farms Inc | Claypool, IN 46510 | $8,874 |
12 | Rhoades Farms Partnership | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $7,852 |
13 | Les Carson | Dickson, TN 37055 | $7,758 |
14 | John Deneve | Claypool, IN 46510 | $7,500 |
15 | Marsh And Pfeiffer Trust | Warsaw, IN 46580 | $6,508 |
16 | Zolman Farms Inc | Warsaw, IN 46581 | $6,216 |
17 | J Richard Lehman | Silver Lake, IN 46982 | $6,052 |
18 | Thomas Price | Warsaw, IN 46580 | $5,714 |
19 | Michael R Reiff | Warsaw, IN 46582 | $5,180 |
20 | Girl Scouts Of Northern Indiana-m | Fort Wayne, IN 46825 | $5,137 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>