Farm Subsidy information
La Porte County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in La Porte County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 2,470
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in La Porte County, Indiana totaled $294,700,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Busse Farms Inc | Hanna, IN 46340 | $858,651 |
62 | Arnold L Rosenbaum | La Crosse, IN 46348 | $846,337 |
63 | Rodger D Popplewell Jr | Union Mills, IN 46382 | $843,059 |
64 | Lawrence Henry Tuholski | Mill Creek, IN 46365 | $836,559 |
65 | Jeffery L Hardin | Union Mills, IN 46382 | $822,663 |
66 | Kelley Farms Inc | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $817,268 |
67 | Peter A Nelson | La Porte, IN 46350 | $808,404 |
68 | Wil-min Farm Inc | La Porte, IN 46350 | $792,319 |
69 | Thomas H Cooreman | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $791,902 |
70 | Maria J Cooreman | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $786,699 |
71 | Eko Acres Farms LLC | La Porte, IN 46350 | $784,881 |
72 | Donald L Van Dierendonck | Walkerton, IN 46574 | $764,664 |
73 | Jeremy T Zolvinski | La Porte, IN 46350 | $762,482 |
74 | Andrew C Evers | Union Mills, IN 46382 | $760,165 |
75 | William A Werner | Hanna, IN 46340 | $756,106 |
76 | Howard E Ewen | La Crosse, IN 46348 | $753,976 |
77 | Harold T Parker | La Porte, IN 46350 | $746,490 |
78 | Ru-barb Holsteins Inc | La Porte, IN 46350 | $730,815 |
79 | Louis R Abbett | La Crosse, IN 46348 | $728,840 |
80 | Evan S Barr | La Porte, IN 46350 | $728,175 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”