Conservation Reserve Program in La Porte County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 521
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in La Porte County, Indiana totaled $12,122,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Marla Niksch | Valparaiso, IN 46385 | $55,071 |
62 | Aaron Fogus | La Porte, IN 46350 | $54,763 |
63 | Jerrald - Kabelin Fa T Kabelin | Venice, FL 34285 | $53,401 |
64 | Cuson Farms Inc | Mill Creek, IN 46365 | $53,306 |
65 | Audrey M Hagenow | La Porte, IN 46350 | $53,210 |
66 | Sikora Farms LLC | Phoenix, AZ 85085 | $51,734 |
67 | Connie M Mc Means | Wooster, OH 44691 | $51,575 |
68 | Rex E Miller | Wooster, OH 44691 | $51,575 |
69 | E-farm LLC | Michigan City, IN 46360 | $50,873 |
70 | Curtis L Frank | La Crosse, IN 46348 | $50,787 |
71 | Estate Of Frances Ward | La Porte, IN 46350 | $50,412 |
72 | Martin P Conner | La Porte, IN 46350 | $49,854 |
73 | Louis Szilagyi | Mill Creek, IN 46365 | $49,607 |
74 | Shirley Mangold | Rolling Prairie, IN 46371 | $47,259 |
75 | Allen Chlupacek | Walkerton, IN 46574 | $45,828 |
76 | Gene M Jones Revocable Trust | La Porte, IN 46350 | $43,722 |
77 | Nowak Farms LLC | La Porte, IN 46350 | $42,762 |
78 | Patrick Wiseman | La Porte, IN 46350 | $41,474 |
79 | Patricia Towle | Rolling Prairie, IN 46371 | $41,319 |
80 | Reece Shaffner | Mill Creek, IN 46365 | $39,772 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”