Farm Subsidy information
La Porte County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in La Porte County, Indiana, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 730
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in La Porte County, Indiana totaled $16,427,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Schafer Farms Partnership | La Crosse, IN 46348 | $324,093 |
2 | Bannwart Farms Inc | North Liberty, IN 46554 | $264,854 |
3 | Maria J Cooreman | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $247,219 |
4 | Thomas H Cooreman | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $247,219 |
5 | Abbett Farms LLC | La Crosse, IN 46348 | $243,188 |
6 | Livinghouse Farms Inc | La Porte, IN 46350 | $240,747 |
7 | Koehn Farms Inc | La Porte, IN 46350 | $234,834 |
8 | Rice Farms LLC | Wanatah, IN 46390 | $218,781 |
9 | Tuholski Farms Inc | Mill Creek, IN 46365 | $207,488 |
10 | Jesswein Operating LLC | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $206,971 |
11 | Wykoff Bros Farms Inc | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $171,544 |
12 | Robbie R Lawrenz | Michigan City, IN 46360 | $157,814 |
13 | Tom Peeples | Hamlet, IN 46532 | $155,412 |
14 | Rodger D Popplewell Jr | Union Mills, IN 46382 | $152,652 |
15 | Andrew P Hagenow | La Crosse, IN 46348 | $150,658 |
16 | Mr Randall F Szczypiorski | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $141,011 |
17 | Betty J Szczypiorski | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $141,011 |
18 | Martin Barr | La Porte, IN 46350 | $140,050 |
19 | Marsha Barr | La Porte, IN 46350 | $140,050 |
20 | Gorski Farms Partnership | La Crosse, IN 46348 | $139,020 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>