Total Emergency Relief Program in La Porte County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 126
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in La Porte County, Indiana totaled $2,416,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Garwood Orchards Inc | La Porte, IN 46350 | $329,019 |
2 | Koehn Farms Inc | La Porte, IN 46350 | $295,970 |
3 | Rex Tyler Ochs | Grovertown, IN 46531 | $102,553 |
4 | Abbett Farms LLC | La Crosse, IN 46348 | $98,441 |
5 | Robbie R Lawrenz | Michigan City, IN 46360 | $86,612 |
6 | Ryan M Weaver | Westville, IN 46391 | $76,977 |
7 | Todd Rosenbaum | Wanatah, IN 46390 | $60,986 |
8 | Rice Farms LLC | Wanatah, IN 46390 | $56,142 |
9 | Paarlberg Farms | Rolling Prairie, IN 46371 | $55,153 |
10 | Michael K Weaver | La Porte, IN 46350 | $51,533 |
11 | Mkc Farms Inc | Westville, IN 46391 | $50,895 |
12 | Renee Rudolph | Wanatah, IN 46390 | $47,964 |
13 | John Warren Coulter | Westville, IN 46391 | $46,235 |
14 | Joseph Rudolph | Wanatah, IN 46390 | $41,708 |
15 | Bannwart Farms Inc | North Liberty, IN 46554 | $40,974 |
16 | Parkman Farms LLC | Westville, IN 46391 | $39,697 |
17 | Mark A Scarborough | La Crosse, IN 46348 | $39,260 |
18 | Schafer Farms Partnership | La Crosse, IN 46348 | $36,400 |
19 | Adam J Corbett | Michigan City, IN 46360 | $34,214 |
20 | John A Sampson | Union Mills, IN 46382 | $32,098 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>