Farm Subsidy information
Madison County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Madison County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,739
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Madison County, Indiana totaled $248,420,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Likens Farms | Anderson, IN 46011 | $6,940,544 |
2 | Neese Farms | Frankton, IN 46044 | $3,607,463 |
3 | Bays Farms | Anderson, IN 46011 | $2,950,643 |
4 | Shuter Sunset Farms Inc | Frankton, IN 46044 | $2,189,309 |
5 | Bair Grain Farms Inc | Summitville, IN 46070 | $2,028,841 |
6 | Simmermon Farms Inc | Lapel, IN 46051 | $1,889,851 |
7 | Thomas E Delph | Anderson, IN 46011 | $1,790,081 |
8 | Richard Smith Fms Inc | Anderson, IN 46011 | $1,768,493 |
9 | Ronald K Miller Farms Inc | Alexandria, IN 46001 | $1,691,853 |
10 | C & A Bouslog Farms | Frankton, IN 46044 | $1,674,902 |
11 | Modern Growers Inc | Pendleton, IN 46064 | $1,596,683 |
12 | David Lee Bodenhorn | Noblesville, IN 46060 | $1,574,505 |
13 | Kevin Antrim | Frankton, IN 46044 | $1,517,302 |
14 | Vaughn Allen Bracken | Anderson, IN 46011 | $1,445,250 |
15 | Ousley Farms Inc | Elwood, IN 46036 | $1,415,636 |
16 | Garland Antrim | Elwood, IN 46036 | $1,367,509 |
17 | Best Farms Inc | Middletown, IN 47356 | $1,319,843 |
18 | Jeffrey Purdue | Pendleton, IN 46064 | $1,290,823 |
19 | Tlf Farms Inc | Lapel, IN 46051 | $1,270,913 |
20 | Jay Lee Smith | Summitville, IN 46070 | $1,252,496 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>