Farm Subsidy information
Marshall County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Marshall County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,456
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Marshall County, Indiana totaled $218,806,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Daniel O Voreis | Argos, IN 46501 | $831,937 |
42 | Homer Seltenright | Plymouth, IN 46563 | $817,753 |
43 | Ronald L Stichter | Bremen, IN 46506 | $812,730 |
44 | Homestead Dairy LLC | Plymouth, IN 46563 | $805,220 |
45 | Larry Miller | Plymouth, IN 46563 | $796,596 |
46 | Mike Long Family Farms LLC | Warsaw, IN 46582 | $793,481 |
47 | Bill Heyde | Bremen, IN 46506 | $779,413 |
48 | Robert Samuelson & Sons | Plymouth, IN 46563 | $777,792 |
49 | Mark Mcintire | Argos, IN 46501 | $777,727 |
50 | Neal Young | Bourbon, IN 46504 | $748,589 |
51 | Bryan R Wipperman | South Bend, IN 46628 | $742,068 |
52 | Robert Broeker | Culver, IN 46511 | $734,446 |
53 | Michael Balsley Farms Inc | Bremen, IN 46506 | $731,495 |
54 | Allen Motz | Plymouth, IN 46563 | $728,534 |
55 | Mike Long Family Farms | Warsaw, IN 46582 | $727,988 |
56 | Ringer Bros Inc | Plymouth, IN 46563 | $724,948 |
57 | Jon C Rettinger | Bourbon, IN 46504 | $722,563 |
58 | Hal M Sullivan | Argos, IN 46501 | $713,477 |
59 | Robin Roberts | Plymouth, IN 46563 | $709,294 |
60 | Brian Norris | Plymouth, IN 46563 | $709,214 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”