Farm Subsidy information
Miami County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Miami County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 2,332
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Miami County, Indiana totaled $213,434,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | John H Hanaway | Peru, IN 46970 | $386,684 |
102 | Ronnie Boswell | Peru, IN 46970 | $382,886 |
103 | Radel Farms Inc | Peru, IN 46970 | $380,738 |
104 | Dennis J Harts | Amboy, IN 46911 | $380,551 |
105 | J & B Troyer Farms Inc | Peru, IN 46970 | $374,942 |
106 | Glenn R Conner | Peru, IN 46970 | $374,486 |
107 | Michael J Knight II | Macy, IN 46951 | $374,239 |
108 | V L Hostetler Farms Inc | Converse, IN 46919 | $370,022 |
109 | Beacon Credit Union ** | Wabash, IN 46992 | $367,973 |
110 | Larry L Conner | Peru, IN 46970 | $367,335 |
111 | Mark A Horner | Converse, IN 46919 | $363,567 |
112 | Steven L Braden | Peru, IN 46970 | $361,437 |
113 | Kendel Hattery | Peru, IN 46970 | $360,951 |
114 | Roland Keith Overton | Peru, IN 46970 | $360,493 |
115 | Troy R Hattery | Peru, IN 46970 | $360,303 |
116 | David M Hartley | Peru, IN 46970 | $359,659 |
117 | Robert R Gilbreath | Bunker Hill, IN 46914 | $359,530 |
118 | Richard G Wood | Bunker Hill, IN 46914 | $354,490 |
119 | R Craig Harts | Kokomo, IN 46901 | $348,283 |
120 | J David Hanaway | Peru, IN 46970 | $347,341 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”